Schools are entrusted with the challenges of devising innovative approaches to dealing with educational issues that affect learners. One of these growing issues is the continual decline in student competency; as a result, schools are working hard to keep up with student growth. “An intervention cannot be called an intervention if it is not progress monitored. An intervention without progress monitoring is just an activity” (Alahmari, 2020). Every year, education policy teams are formed to assess the required causes and possible improvements to help schools improve academically. Response to intervention (RTI) has been a prominent discussion area in both specialist and general learning. It assists individuals with troublesome students and identifies children qualified for special needs education because of a mental condition or other impairment. The RTI approach depth picture inquiry interventions and various evaluations have been used to track students’ progress toward tiered education (Florida Problem Solving & Response to Intervention Project, 2022). This paper will therefore provide a literature review based on Response to the Intervention plan and case study, giving a description of the RIT methods I would use as a class teacher.
Being the classroom teacher, I am anticipated to embrace the professionalism that will aid in meeting all the learners’ requirements. Therefore, I must seek such interventions that will guarantee the success of all the students. RTI is the practice of providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched. Furthermore, this procedure aids in detecting learners with learning difficulties and other behavioral and academic challenges. Besides that, specific therapies are developed centered on the child’s response and capabilities (Collins, 2020). Educational institutions require this approach since they must deal with learners and kids who may have difficulties with studying or who are disabled. RTI is such a multi-tiered classroom method for learners experiencing learning and behavioral issues.
Across the RTI process, every student’s progress is tracked. Exceptional education tutors, general education instructors, and experts are major drivers of the program. The most prevalent stages involved in the RTI include individual, small-group, and whole-class interventions. I will therefore apply this intervention throughout the remedial-based teaching decisions. Thus, the system will make it easy to create a well-integrated paradigm of instructions and interventions guided by the respective learner’s outcome data collected. This system will help identify various learners experiencing learning disabilities.
Feldman (2020) examined the RTI paradigm and explained how the Embellished with “Disability Educational Development Act and No Kid Left Behind” (NCLB) enhanced RTI implementation in everyday classrooms. The author’s primary goal is to emphasize the importance of school employees in implementing RTI features, including evidence-based therapies and assessments. Empirical data on general teachers’ perceptions of RTI modifications were presented. As per the RTI-based literature, more research is required on the impact of career progression, general teacher perspectives, and RTI management. In addition, there must be a significant level of consistency in establishing the RTI processes’ implementation (Suhrheinrich et al., 2022). RTI-based Tier 2 engagement, for instance, does not provide a coherent basis for making about nonresponsive students in Tier 2 support or when to refer learners to Tier 3 participation, as per the research. Feldman (2020) examined general studies teachers’ engagement in RTI implementation in appraising, selecting inquiry help, and assessing students’ achievements to guide decision-making. Instructors’ career development initiatives are investigated to see if they impact their policies and knowledge.
It is said that RTI offers treatments for children who are in danger of failing in school and creates a far more comprehensive review in assessing people with learning disabilities. To adopt RTI sustainably, school administrators must modify how organizations cooperate to encourage this process, especially regarding collaborations between inclusive-based classroom instructors (Feldman, 2020). It provides remediation to children and evaluates them regularly to ensure that practically all children receive assistance before being submitted for a learning disability diagnosis.
Understanding the backdrop of RTI initially from the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act perspective assisted in intervention deployment. The IDEIA devised a simple and practical technique to prevent failing students from being categorized as handicapped by delivering RTI programs (ideapartnership.org, 2022). According to the NCLB, it is an element of quality-based education, which asserts that disabled kids always have the opportunity to receive learning in mainstream schools and actively engage in standardized exams. It holds governments, districts, and schools accountable for their learner’s accomplishments. RTI is a multi-tiered method for early detection and support of children with academic and behavioral issues. RTI begins with increased training and qualitative evaluation of all general learning students. Weak students are offered increasingly intense treatments to help them develop quickly.
Florida Response to Intervention
As per the Florida RTI Project vision, all the educators will apply an efficient and productive multi-tiered-based system of interventions to ensure all learners’ academic, psychological, and social-emotional success within the comprehensive education system. The project’s aim is to improve all students’ academic, social-emotional, and psychological outcomes. This can be done by strengthening all Florida instructors’ capacity to: Build and sustain a single Universal Education system that is the design, execution, and assessment. In addition, it will successfully implement and sustain a multi-tiered-based system of student assistance in every region, classroom and school.
I am confident that a few of my first-grade learners require more assistance than I believe I can offer in my lessons. I was thinking of referring a few for special education assessments. But, before I could do so, I was informed about RTI and instructed that I needed to put the processes in place in my classroom. Assessment practices will be the methods I will be employing. The student scores based on their performance will be some of the records I will be keeping. Positive student improvement and active classroom participation are the outcomes I wish to see.
I began implementing RTI after distributing a grade level-based benchmark method that revealed just 85% of kids had mastered the material. I was aware that eleven kids earned a 50 percent and below on the assessment. James is among these learners who received a 1 out of 5 on every section. The goal of the benchmark was to demonstrate that first-graders had understood multi-digit additions and subtractions and could answer them in a variety of ways. I did not grasp the principles throughout this benchmark, as seen by James’s scores. The method that I will employ regarding the RTI initiative is the provision of assignments to the students. Some of the records that I will collect include the student scores as per their performance. I hope that after this program, most of the students will have improved academically.
As per the meeting conducted among the first-grade teachers, they decided to draw up a strategy for the eight students. These learners were to assemble in one group for twenty-five minutes and debate the benchmark’s themes. If required, the amount of time they may meet would be extended. The learners would assemble four times per week and the school meetings to work on exercises and arithmetic questions to learn the idea thoroughly. The headteacher at the school would be in charge of these meetings. Per week, every teacher aims to gather relevant data and schedule meetings to determine whether the children are progressing due to the discussions. The meeting between the teachers and the children went for seven weeks. The data obtained from the tasks provided to the children after the implementation was completed revealed that eight out of eleven students had improved.
Furthermore, eight students were capable of completing all of the topics on the benchmarks with a score of at least four out of five. This intervention approach succeeded for these eight students. James and two other learners, however, showed no signs of improvement. After consultation with other teachers, we decided to organize another conference with the other instructors about James plus the two other students following a lot of complaints from their parents. Throughout the meeting, we discussed a variety of possible explanations for why James and the other two learners were still having difficulty absorbing the concepts. As a result of their participation in the group discussion and the regular teachings, they exhibited some progress indicators; the instructors agreed to keep doing it. We added further individual-based instructions for place value abilities every three days per week. I sought advice from the math coach to improve their chances of success. James’s progress and how well he adapts to the lesson will be assessed on a 3-day basis. This went for a total of five, and James, plus the other two students, showed a positive deviation.
After reviewing the case study several times and categorizing the sections, I learned more about the RTI processes and how care and effort ensure that every student under the RTI initiative succeeds. I knew that it is critical to provide various assessments to learners and monitor their progress to determine how well the knowledge is being absorbed and whether they will still have difficulty grasping the topics. The RTI-based data collections were critical because they provided me with more tangible information than simply stating that the leaner had improved or needed assistance. I have learned that; cooperation is essential in any educational setting as it contributes to better performance. This is seen when the collaboration between other teachers, like the maths teacher, aids in improving James and the two other students. Generally, the case study has greatly benefited my understanding of the value of RTI and how I may apply that knowledge in the classroom to help the students succeed. As a result of this case study, I will be capable of adequately implementing RTI in my next classroom meeting to maximize the performance of all learners that may enroll.
Alahmari, A. A. (2020). Classroom teachers’ perceptions of response to intervention implementation: A qualitative interview study. Journal Of Educational and Psychological Researches, 17(65), 42-75. Web.
Collins, T. J. (2020). Quantitative analysis of impact of Response to Intervention on 2019 Sixth-Grade Rural Public Middle School Missouri Assessment Program Performance by Free and Reduced Lunch Eligibility (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia). Web.
Ideapartnership.org. (2022). Ideapartnership.org. Web.
Solving, F. P. (2011). Response to Intervention Project. (2011). Problem solving and response to intervention: A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida. Tampa, FL. Web.
Suhrheinrich, J., Wang, T., Chan, J., Holt, T., Stahmer, A. C., Rieth, S. R.,… & Sam, A. (2022). Developing an empirically-based adaptation an training model for intervention scale up of classroom pivotal response teaching: A protocol paper. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100107. Web.